Sunday, April 29, 2012

Modern Family - The Last Walt

Season 3, Episode 20

Aired April 17, 2012


               Another great episode of Modern Family. It was the same funny realism of any modern family. This was not the best episode I have seen, nor the funniest; but very entertaining nonetheless. 

               Many events pass in this episode but they aren't all extremely moving. In this episode we get to meet Cameron's father for the first time, Haley throws a party using Manny as the supervision, Claire presses Luke to feel bad about the passing over their neighbor's death, and Phil desperately tries to create a unique father-daughter moment for Alex. The best part of this episode was the scenes with Alex and Phil. The worst that could possibly happen while he is "creating" these special events happens. A seagull flies away with his attempt at his neighbor's request having his Navy dog tags thrown into the sea when he dies, the restaurant serving "The World's Best Milkshake" wasn't and The World's Best everything-on-the-menu gave Alex food poisoning. It ended with the sweetest notion from Phil: after explaining how Eugene Cernan wrote his daughter's name on the moon and all dads hate him for being the best dad, Phil, himself, wrote Alex's initials on the moon sign of the restaurant they were at. 
               
               This episode did not feature the hilariousness of Gloria or the confusion of Luke as much as others, but it was just as entertaining for any family to watch. 

Monday, April 9, 2012

The Hunger Games - brief


Long story short....


It was long. I barely survived those 2 ½ hours but I think because I read the book and knew how everything turned out, it made it incredibly boring. Though, I do think because I read the book I understood the characters and how everything worked in the games; I followed the adaptation better than my friend who had only read the back of the book. It’s only rated PG so you don't see very many people being killed except for four or five, which was a disappointment from what I was expecting after reading the book. Some people complain that it is completely different from the book. I strongly disagree. I think it was extremely close to the book and that's why it was so long. They also say Jennifer Lawrence was a terrible choice for Katniss. Again, I disagree. The casting was very close and you could tell who was who if you knew the characters in the book, but then again, if you don’t it may be hard to follow. The ending doesn’t match the book, but the rest of the movie is incredibly close. I'm not saying it was a terrible movie, I am a fan, I have read the whole series, and as a fan, I was disappointed. If you haven’t read the books, the movie might be great. I can’t tell you how great it was from an outsider’s point of view. I, myself, was addicted to series and couldn’t get enough. Now, I don’t really want anymore. For anyone who hasn't see it and would like to, I have one thing to say: May the odds be in your favor. 

The Hunger Games

Directed by Gary Ross

Based on the book by Suzanne Collins

Staring Jennifer Lawrence, Josh Hutcherson and Liam Hemsworth

See the shorter version here

~Spoiler Alert~

The book was an international hit, selling over 36 million copies in countries all over the world. Fans flooded movie theater plazas and lobbies on March 23rd, to be the first to see the start of the Hunger Games’ Trilogy movie adaptation. In less than 24 hours after the premier, the Hunger Games was declared as the new Harry Potter and Katniss Everdeen as the new Bella Swan; I just had to see it for myself.

As a fan and trilogy reader, I was psyched to see the movie. My friends who had read the book and saw the movie had gushed about how amazing it was through Facebook and MSN. The trailer captured key emotions from the book that shocked the reader and pulled them into the story, as the trailer should. I soon realised though, people who weren’t familiar with the books and hadn’t read the series weren’t attached to the trailer at all. Hunger Games fans studied the movie production’s every move, knowing exactly how the cast was being formed and how the story was laid out. Even the fans who didn’t up until the premier, knew from the brilliant casting and movie promotion what was going on. Strangers to the story were struck with confusion on the events being shown in the trailer; this lead to a lacking of attraction to the film for non-readers.

Finally, when I found the time to see the movie on a less-busier date, a week after it premiered, I prepared myself for an adventure of a life time; a two hour marathon of excitement; an action-packed, on-the-edge-of-your-seat movie experience. What did I receive? A waste of preparation.

The movie starts with a summary of how the actual Hunger Games work in the area of Panem, a waste of time for the readers but a great start for the newcomers. Katniss and her sister, Prim, follow that introduction immediately exposing the closeness of their family. This gave me confidence in the movie, I awaited more emotion that would pull through and hopefully it would be as interesting as the book. After the reaping and the dramatic family separation, the movie just seemed stretched and so long. The training, the Ceasar Flickerman interview, the scenes with Cinna, all seemed so agonisingly long. I have read the book two times before I had seen the movie, which I do believe changed the way I saw it. I think it seemed so long because it was like I was reading it for a third time, knowing all the details that were coming and how much longer until the end.

When they got to the arena, I was hoping for finally, more action, which again, I never got. The slow-motion right at the beginning after the countdown didn’t add to the mood at all. You couldn’t feel the pain of the tributes being stabbed to death when all you saw was Cato carrying a bloody knife. You couldn’t feel the fear of Katniss or Peeta as the ran from the bloodbath too gory to film. I do understand they needed to keep this movie PG which might have been a mistake to the extreme fanatics who were expecting the gore Suzanne Collins expressed in her book.

I have never found myself on Team Peeta or Team Gale but the movie did change my opinion on both. It’s not that I’ve grown to like either one better by the interpretations of the astonishing, young actors, but that the director or the actors must have seen them differently than I had imagined and put them out through his eyes. That is the problem with book to movie adaptations, it’s adapted from the way the director felt the story and anything can be changed. Though, for me, they weren’t changed in a good way. Peeta seemed very weak, very unconfident. In the book he was fairly negative but I don’t recall him being so negative you honestly felt he had no chance; the book made him seem secretly and mysteriously powerful enough to even be second to Katniss. The introduction for Gale is a bit misleading; the book makes him feel like a loyal best friend to Katniss, but he comes out in the movie as a bully who teases Katniss but then, confusingly, immediately supports her later on.

I’m happy to say there are almost no flaws in this movie. No flaws as in something that you see that makes you say, “Seriously? Why would they do that?” Like in Jurassic Park, how you see the enormous, flying pterodactyls soaring in the sky with nothing to keep them in yet they never leave the island's perimeter. The ending was a little wacky though. The obvious inference is Seneca Crane is killed, but how would you expect a rich man to eat the dry, unappetizing Nightlock berries left with him if he is just locked up in a room with them? Also, taking into consideration that he is the Gamemaker and is supposed to be the one who designed the Games so he would have put the poisonous berries in the arena; wouldn't he know those were the poisonous berries he created and wouldn't he be smart enough not to eat them?

I'm not saying it was a terrible movie, I am a fan, I have read the whole series, and as a fan, I was disappointed. If you haven’t read the books, the movie might be great. I can’t tell you how great it was from an outsider’s point of view. I’m not saying you shouldn’t see it. It’s one of those movies that everyone just has to see so they can be on that list with everyone who saw it. It’s like The Titanic, to some people it’s all around amazing, to some it’s a terrible story line but still a great movie, and to some a complete disaster. For anyone who hasn't see it and would like to, I have one thing to say: May the odds be in your favor. 



1st Post

Hello, I'm new, and I'm not exactly sure what to do. The whole reason I started this is, besides my love of movies, that my family and friends tell me I'm good at "reviewing" movies. I guess I'm good at being honest and persuading people in any way I want. I guess you can trust what I say because my parents are/were in the movie business and I've been around movie production, filming, wardrobe and animation. So, I guess you could say I know how movies work. I'm not sure how to promote this blog or anything but it would be great if you like what I wrote or agree if you could send on to a friend or become a member. My first review is of the Hunger Games because that's the last movie I saw that is "new." I apologize for that but maybe if I see people more people wanting to know about more movies, I will have a better opportunity. I would appreciate that if you didn't agree with my opinion, you would find someone else's. I'm honest in all my reviews and I don't blame anyone for anything "bad" I review. Like I said before, I'm just new here. Thank you.